If you think about it for a second: You got two sides warring against each other for blind supremacy--not just world domination.
Both sides use the same ideology against one another--trying to beat the other into the ground mercilessly. They both enjoy killing innocents %26 their enemy alike without hesitation.
They both proclaim 'victory' when something big happens--but in the long run, there's little effect on the overall war. So they go back to killing each other even more.
They both think that they are on a mission from 'God' %26 they alone have the righteous power to triumph over the other--flying in the face of reality all at once.
And all that's left in their wake--when they get done (if they get done) is ruined nations, displaced populaces, and economically shattered nations.
Are they really all that different when it comes down to it? Or are they just cut from the same cloth?
(And please: I would like some intelligent questions. No politically charged rhetoric!)
How different is radical Christianity from radical Islam these days?internet
nothing really.
But Propaganda from the Right wing, will only say that Radical Islam is bad, while Radical Christianity is alright.
How different is radical Christianity from radical Islam these days?network
radical=radical
why differentiate?
Let's think first, who started first with killing the other and who's occupying who? I don't know about radical christians because I don't think they are really christians but for Islam they're only asked to fight if they're attacked first.
Some go about killing people in Darfur, indonesia, iran, iraq Pakistan and various parts of the world
The other threatens that they won't turn the other cheek, if attacked.
No comments:
Post a Comment